EOS R6 Mark II

If you already had Canon RF glass it would be one thing, but, I would not be willing to replace a Sony 24-70 GM ii for an older EF lens with an adapter. I know someone with an R6ii paired with an EF 24-70 and that thing just sucks to use. Like you can feel the lens motors twitching back and forth wh

The irony is that I had that exact complaint 12 years ago; I was running dance photography workshops as part of a (contemporary) dance festival I was running, and I’d hired a lot of cameras for participants. High ISO handling was featured with these Canon models, but I found I was having to use insa

The Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 is a faster and sharper lens than the Canon 24-105mm F4-7.1, Just for that lens alone, I would opt for the Canon R50. The full-frame equivalent would be an 24-70mm F2.8 lens but they are significantly more expensive. There are certain benefits for sure with R6 II but I would s

mpb yes ebay noooo i can speak intelligently about Canon products. and about birds, i shoot night skies a little. video? sorry... never do it there are three cameras from Canon you should consider R6 Mk II, R5, R7 for birds, the R7 will be superior to the R6 mkII unless u hide in a blind and wait fo

Just dusted off my trusty Canon 5D3 for a shoot the other day and I like the pictures out of it better than my R6II. Exposure preview is nice and AF and video are better on mirrorless, but that doesn't mean the images are. I also used one battery to shoot all day. A camera is just a tool. Having a D

In my opinion it's a non-issue, and while it's visible in lab tests, you aren't likely to ever notice it in your real world photos. Stacked sensors (in this case partially stacked) pay a tiny DR penalty in return for faster readout speeds which for most people is going to be far more useful. If you

Это снято на Canon R6MkII. Но не надо фиксироваться на модели камеры. У меня есть подобные снимки сделанные на старенький Canon 1100d. И они не хуже этих. Уверен, что и на какие-то другие недорогие камеры можно такое снять.

I had the 100-400Lii and 24-105Lii on EF, I felt like I had to change lenses too much, I was always near the 105 and when I swapped, the 100 mm was slightly too much. One day a friend lent me his ef 70-200 2.8iii, I knew I was going to get it, I also really liked the internal zooming. I didn’t want

I have both substantial m43 and canon FF gear. OM1.2 150-600, 40-150F4, 12-40 2.8. 75 1.8 etc. R5.2 R6.1 200-800, EF 100-400 L mk II. 24-105L, several L primes and non L primes. I would take the Om1.2 over my R6 for just about everything other than razor thin DOF work. I’d take my R5.2 for everythin