LS50 II Wireless

I have both. One set of Beolab 8 in my bedroom and one set as rear speakers to my Beovision Theatre in the living room. The Kef LSX II is used as desktop speakers in my office. Like @matteventu wrote above, the Beolab 8 are more similar to LS 50 Wireless II than LSX. The Beolab 8 can play louder and

Yes I was relieved it was so simple to dial in. I have the Kube 8. As someone new to hi-fi and living in a more compact space, for me it truly was the perfect solution for someone wanting a “lifestyle” oriented setup while being “audiophile approved”. I think KEF smartly occupies this surprisingly b

KEF and my KEF dealer both recommended zero toe in for my LS50 Wireless II setup. And personal experience agrees with no toe in.

KEF LSX II are definitely not going to fill a large room. They are SPL limited to near-field listening only. LS50wII would be better options for larger space.

For near-field desktop listening I think the LSX II are perfect. Especially when using their table stands, or similar stands, that direct their speaker elements towards your ears. I don’t think LS50 Wireless II will improve the sound for desktop listening. I have also thought about adding a KC62 sub

I have been using the LS50 Wireless II as desktop speakers for a while now and they are amazing, and the clarity was just so much better than the LSX II which were already amazing. I use a Topping D10S connected via USB to my computer, and then Coax to the LS50. This provides a perfect USB connectio

I’m using the kef ls50w ii with the kc62 in my living room. Can’t speak for the lsx setup but I would argue the ls50 Is already a bit underpowered from time to time. Oops, misread the question. The kc62 is definitely helping out for me, but it depends on the room size I guess. For 30m2 I would defin

After a lot of testing with my KEF LS50 Wireless II + SVS SB1000 Pro setup, I finally measured everything properly with a UMIK-1 + REW and the results were really interesting. At first I thought I had a lack of bass around the crossover region, but measurements showed the opposite: I actually had to

Yes, the SVS SB 3000’s are better than the Micro, but I’m running two of them with the LS50 wireless II’s in a 9500 cubic foot space. The Micro and LSX II LT’s are in a 1600 cubic foot space.

Why not skip all the electronics and get LS50 Wireless IIs? They’re probably cheaper and sound better, since the LS50 W IIs have all the electronics built-in and optimized to work together seamlessly. You can stream from anything to them. (I use iPhone, iPad and Mac) Plus they directly support lots