LUMIX GH7

You understand that as soon you add IBIS it will no longer be a “GM1 markll”… not even a “GM5 markII”. It needs to be thicker. In the dream land (Panasonic as any other company is ruled by their finances and bets that have profit) I would prefer them to make the possibly smallest IBIS+PDAF camera wi

It's baffling, specially as they need to gain market share. Nikon even has internal RAW, will this have it? And if it does, will it be an useful codec or the same useless ProresRaw that's on the GH7? What I can Panasonic offering is better color science, much better IBIS, Open Gate and better interf

If you have a limited budget, MFT can be great. Used G9 is great value. If you have money to spend, I see almost no reason to buy into MFT at this point for video. Higher frame rates and less overheating are really the only considerations and most people don’t need to worry about either of those. Pa

Now the GH7 is severely underperforming in sales compared to Panasonic’s other models. What is this based on? The Amazon top sellers list? I'm not doubting the claim, mind you. Just wondering. Anyway, you can see it even in this subreddit. Pansonic releases camera with specs and features better than

Good deals on shit sensors nobody wants. Panasonic clearly needed 4K 120 frames per second for GH7, and Sony wasn’t willing to make that chip.

Here are my experiences with GH5II and Resolve, some problems I bumped into and how I dealt with them over time. There was some useful info on the internet, yotube creators etc, but there was much more repeated 'solutions' that were not good enough for me, so I had to find my own. I hope that you'll

I think the disconnect is that I have no interest in the sorts of photography where there is actual money to be made. (Not because I hate money, it's just the things I find interesting happen to not be financially fruitful.) So the pros who draw my attention are the ones doing things that you aren't

I’m not talking about light per sqmm. I’m talking about total light which is what determines low light performance. Normalizing exposure is meaningless - ISO6400 on MFT looks like shit, whereas it looks clean on FF. You would need a 2 stop faster lens on MFT to get the same SNR. Video stabilization

I ditched the vlog-l alltogether. I shoot in 709like as I need really fast turnaround. Anyway, I can't get into serious grading with 8bit QHD 50p footage. Panasonic LUT was not good for GH5II or GH7, I agree. The last combo that worked for me was the Nicest LUT (Varicam set) and I even liked one if

The same limitations of small sensors—poor low-light, depth of field is way deeper than on larger sensors. I don’t like MFT glass in general, which means manual glass, which begs the question why you would purchase cinema glass for MFT. Apparently the GH7 has decent autofocus, but there has been no