a6700

I estimate it wouldn’t sell. At given Ricoh pricing, they would have to compete with the Sony A7c II and A6700 and some Fujis, the Sonys have way better AF and an arsenal of lenses to choose from. As product managers use to say:”Never listen to enthusiasts if you don’t wanna go broke”.😎

I would buy the Sony 70-350 G First, If your Plan is going to a Safari. Better Glas often Beats better camera Body. And the A6400 has a good Autofocus and you can use Tracking Autofocus. If you mainly/mostly taking Fotos and almost never Take Videos then honestly upgrading to the A6700 is Just a was

I'll start this off by clarifying I only have experience with Sony & Olympus / OM systems. I've tried to use the Sony A6700 and the Sony 90mm for handheld insect macro photography and eventually gave up. The sensor readout time and buffer were too slow for my style of photography. I ended up going w

Feature wise , it's very hard to beat an OM Systems OM-1 with a pro macro lens for macro photography. The body focus brackets better than any Sony body I've used and also does focus stacking in body. For macro photography the shallower depth of field is usually not helpful , so the crop factor of m4

I currently shoot an A6700. I previously shot m43 for 10 years, with these cameras: EM5 mark1, EM5 mark2, EM1 mark2, Lumix GX9. With regard to sizes, it's not as straightforward as you might think. APSC has really caught up in compact lenses. But the absolute smallest ones like 14mm f2.5, 15mm f1.7,

Ich sage auch R10 (bzw. R50) + 100-400. Bei Canon bekommt man schon bei relativ günstigen Kameras Vogelautofokus (R50 Body für 600€) und bei Sony leider erst ab der A6700 (für die man doppelt so viel zahlen muss). Das 100-400 kostet auch kaum mehr als das 70-350.

True. But for safari photos, an a6400+200-600 would be a better combo than a6700+70-350

I don't shoot video, so I can't practically answer that, but the a6700 is better from what I understand. I still have a small Fuji kit. The difference in low light between modern APS-C and modern M43 is minimal enough that it isn't a consideration for me. Olympus has a better lens selection. The len

Die Sache ist, dass man bei Canon Vogelerkennung schon für deutlich weiniger Geld bekommt als bei Sony und 400mm für weniger Geld als bei Nikon. Klar, das 70-350 scheint auch ein sehr ordentliches Objektiv zu sein, aber Vogelerkennung gibt es erst ab der A6700 und die kostet allein schon über 1000€.

I appreciate that. I've shot Canon, Nikon, Fuji and Sony for several years each over the last 20 years. It comes down to the colors and rendering of Fuji for me. I want something as an edc that produces the colors I like without needing to heavy lift in post to get what I want out of them. Sony is t