a6700

I’m pretty new to panning and recently tried shooting some panning shots at night in Kabukicho. A lot of my photos didn’t turn out great (either too blurry, or the subject (the cars) wasn’t the color I was hoping for). There were tons of black taxis and barely any green or yellow ones This is one of

If you're budget, it should work. Otherwise get A6700 at least, better processor and focusing. I have A6600, it is old for Bird Photography.

GRs are super portable, so you are inclined to take it to more places, take more photos and create more chances to take good picture. However, these are niche cameras with dogshit video quality, fairly slow fixed prime lens and mediocre at best autofocus - old Nikon D750 blows it out of the water an

Kommt letztlich aufs Budget an und was dir persönlich wichtig ist. Ich hab selbst vor zwei Jahren mit der Sony A6000 angefangen und für den Preis, den du gebraucht zahlst, ist die wirklich eine starke Wahl. Mittlerweile bin ich auf eine A6700 umgestiegen, aber ehrlich gesagt würde man den Unterschie

One thing that can bring you closer to the Fuji experience: use a lens with an aperture ring. That frees up the front and rear dials to be dedicated to shutter speed and ISO, which feels much more natural. That said, I made the jump from the XT3 to XT4 to XT5 and ultimately landed on the a6700, and

Also ich war selber an der Nordschleife mit meiner a7iv und dem 70-200 von sony und hätte mir deutlich mehr reichweite gewünscht. mit dem 100-400 von sony war es dann deutlich angenehmer, deswegen würde ich persönlich OP eher zum a6700 + 70-350 setup raten. wenn er sich taktisch clever platziert dan

Everybody's recommending camera bodies as if lenses are growing on trees for free. Lenses are better investments long term, than camera bodies which depreciate quickly. Invest in quality glass OP. For a 2L budget towards shooting wildlife, I'd suggest getting an APSC camera like the A6400 or A6700 a

The 18-55-lens is APS-C lens so using it would be significantly underutlizing the camera - no meaningful performance improvement on FF body like Z6ii. The longer zoom allows for larger light collection, but you'll lose a bit or "reach". Z6 ii is better camera in most ways apart from one: AF - the So

you definitely can shoot static shots without stabilization filmmakers didn't have any for decades and cinema cameras don't have any today just learn how to stabilise your camera while shooting (pushing against strap, leaning on walls/posts/trees, 2 handed grip, top handle, tripod,...) ibis and ois

If your focus is wildlife, the Sony 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 is a better lens (sharper, better AF performance, good optical stabilisation). It's quite an expensive lens (by APS-C standards), but often goes on sale (on Amazon and elsewhere). Maybe get it with a used A6600, to keep within budget, though aut