Alpha 1

A 6X6 medium format negative has an equivalent digital resolution of ~120 megapixels. A Sony A1 has a resolution of 50.1 megapixels. An 8X10 large format negative has approximately 600 megapixels equivalent resolution. I'm no pixel peeper, but it's just obviously not the case that a professional pho

You have to be blind to not see the Sony/FF propaganda online, if you on YouTube 95% of photography content revolves around Sony/Canon/FF and newbies to be hobby basically think mirrorless camera = Sony because they get brainwashed so much when in reality Olympus and Panasonic mop the floor with Son

Short answer: generally, yes, Nikon's latest generation of cameras is going to be better than any Sony APS-C body at AF. Long answer: about 5 years ago AF in mirrorless made a generational leap in performance, the first since we got PDAF on-sensor with the Nikon V1/J1, and saw significant improvemen

Thanks for the reply. Over time I have rented the R3, R5, R6,and R6II, along with the RF 100-500. The first R5 and R6 underwhelmed me, but that was at a time when Canon was still struggling with firmware issues that were finally gone with the R3 and R6II. Their weakness (except for the R5) for me wa

SONY CAMERAS. Looking to purchase a Sony mirrorless. Primary shooting will be landscape/astro (I live in Hawaii) Looking for a professional grade camera. I am going with Sony as they have a military discount and feel its worth supporting them if they are offering that for me. I hear Sony can have ro