PG32UQX

This is partly the reason why we haven't seen miniLED displays in the monitor space that have rivalled the 2021 Asus PG32UQX. It requires a lot of hardware grunt which G-Sync Ultimate module has to run a good MiniLED dimming algo.

What do you mean "similar"? They are not similar, they are not even close. Pulsar is in an entirely different league compared to current OLED. Pulsar at 95fps has better motion clarity than an OLED at 360 fps. The current Pulsar offerings are 360hz. In order for OLED to match the motion clarity of p

Asus PG32uqX. Mini Led isnt as pretty as an oled but its still a beautiful monitor. Where mini led really shines are in bright environments. You also dont have to worry about burn-in. I own this monitor as well as a LG 27"4K 240HZ Oled. I dont remember the model number. I typically play all my compe

As I say in another post doesn't matter if a monitor have 1252, 2304, 576 mini LEDs, is matter a good local dimming algorithm, for this reason Asus PG32UQX (with a G-SYNC ULTIMATE chip) and BenQ EX321UX (due to very good algorithm) is good to excellent, but very expensive. Enjoy your monitor and be

Yes, because BenQ replace that excellent monitor with BenQ EX321UZ an QD-OLED monitor, reasons? High production cost, slow sales and minor market due to OLED madness. Finally a crime to true HDR. But companies isn't sensitive to emotions. Another excellent miniled the Asus PG32UQX (2023 and after mo

The standard display is definitely mediocre, but until we can compare local dimming performance can't write off the XDR entirely - no miniled has yet matched the pg32uqx with it's Nvidia scaler and that's 4 years old

I used to own a PG32UQX and sold it for my PG32UCDP. It was a MASSIVE downgrade in HDR, it was an upgrade in contrast. The PG32UQX at level 2 in the menu did not have blooming. It looked like 95% of the black levels of the OLED. You are fanboying for OLEDS. An OLED at 720hz was not as clear as a 240