EOS R6 Mark II

I like the cropping capabilities of the R5 and their use in studio work, but the large file sizes are mostly a hassle, and thus the reason I was interested in the R6's. file size isn't the priority, what you want is the best autofocus for sports, which always means fully stacked sensors, like the r3

In my opinion it's a non-issue, and while it's visible in lab tests, you aren't likely to ever notice it in your real world photos. Stacked sensors (in this case partially stacked) pay a tiny DR penalty in return for faster readout speeds which for most people is going to be far more useful. If you

I have both substantial m43 and canon FF gear. OM1.2 150-600, 40-150F4, 12-40 2.8. 75 1.8 etc. R5.2 R6.1 200-800, EF 100-400 L mk II. 24-105L, several L primes and non L primes. I would take the Om1.2 over my R6 for just about everything other than razor thin DOF work. I’d take my R5.2 for everythin