EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

Genuinely confused as to how you could get this so wrong. The S1II and the A7V are the same price currently in the US ($2899), The R6 III is $100 cheaper, Nikon Z8 starts at $3100 used on MPB, and the A1 starts at $3400 used. At $2356, the S1ii a DEAL. Let's break this down: - Photography: all the b

You can get a refurb Z8 for new A7V money if you hunt the sales. Z6iii is much cheaper and still extremely good, if you don't need the pixels, the Z6iii is simply a better choice than the A7iv (in fact I'd argue the Z5ii is generally a better choice than the A7iv, having owned both) Despite the use

Do you need it now? The Z5ii is cheaper and satisfies all your requirements, but since it's new it hasn't been discounted yet. If Canon or Sony introduces an R6III or A7V, the previous models will get discounted too. I wouldn't consider the S5IIX since video is not your focus. Realistically the Z6ii

I have good news on the first point, my friend: Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter r

I have the em1ii with the 12-40f2.8 and the 40-150f2.8. I enjoy the system overall but recently decided to run a dual setup with canon r6iii paired with the 24-105 and 100-500. Honestly, I’m actually enjoying the canon a lot more. It isn’t as heavy as I’d feared and the IQ is incredible. I originall

Imo the FX3 doesn’t generally would make sense in a vacuum but there is competition and Sony has allegedly registered the FX3ii which means it will probably be released soon. I think the biggest pros for the FX3 are lowlight, great autofocus, easy to edit files, full sensor 4k and also compatibility

Could've gotten a Canon R6iii with an insane lens but nope you got a slow and clunky 100mp camera with a no continuous af

Canon and Sony produce pretty similar results so I think it really comes down to which one you prefer. I’ve worked with both at different agencies and I prefer canon myself. Not because it’s better, I just prefer the menu systems and how the cameras feel in my hands. Here’s what I absolutely wouldn’

Great. That would speak for the R6V/R6iii imo. Depending on if you want to shoot stills as well you might want to look at the R6iii as well(viewfinder). If you need extreme lowlight capabilities for instance i‘d get the FX3. Also keep in mind that the FX3 has a 1:1 readout in 4k and the Canon is lin

Nikon ZR, Canon R6III if only shopping for new. if you’re open to used options, get an a7sIII or FX3. the dual native iso at 12800 of the Sony’s is insane, but the ZR and R6III still hold their own at 6400. r6III would also have the advantage of being a non-compromised photo camera, in case you ever