EOS R7

Pictures taken with canon eos r7 and 7 artisans 7.5. They are a bit out of focus because the lense is manual and the cat didn’t stop moving

I’m using the Sigma 150-600 f5-6.3 contemporary. I think this is the same lens as yours. It works very, very well with my R5mkII. The reason for this is the faster sensor readout speed on the newer Canon R-series cameras. The only cams I can confirm this lens works well on are: R5mkII R6mkIII The ma

Z50ii is on the same level as a Canon R10 or R7. The R50 is a cut down R10. I own an R10 but favor Nikon for full frame. I got the R10 because it was cheap (at the time, no longer) and small, but has poor battery life. The image quality of the R10 is ho-hum. I bought the 10-18mm lens and it's underw

I’ve used both combos. Get the Z8 and don’t look back. The Canon 150-500mm is sharper and lighter, but the sharpness difference is a non issue. My experience with the R7 is that while it’s capable, it has some weird autofocus quirks and performs awkwardly at times. The Nikon Z8 has a much better kee

Hello all,

I'm wondering if anyone could help me identify what might have happened to my camera in just a week.

I have been using a Canon EOS R7 with a converter to use the Sigma C 150-600, and in the past 14 days or so I have gone from taking photos like 1 and 2, to photos like 3 and 4. The focus

Starting with question 2: Sigma's 18-50 f/2.8 is an amazing lens, I'd describe it as one of the best value options for any lens. I'd say that all of these are pretty easy to use, the a6400 maybe is a bit behind, it has a new autofocus generation that ended up being a revolution, but it's also a bit

if u get a crop sensor canon like the r7, i think the 800 is fine for birds at rest but its difficult to find birds in flight with it. its like trying to find a moving bird with a telescope. but if u have the 100-500 and want more reach, the RF 1.4x extender should do the trick

The lens I think is the best comparison is the Tamron 28-75, which is 25% cheaper, and has 10mm more on the long end. OP could buy the Nikon Z5ii or Sony a7iii, both with the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 G2, and still come out with a bit of money on top, as opposed to buying the R7 and 17-40. The Sigma is the

Thank you so much for your informative response! I'm surprised to hear that your Canon R7 performs worse at low-light than your iPhone. I say that only because the R7 was released not too long ago, and I would think it could outperform even a newer iPhone. That's not a knock on iPhones, of course; I

Another update just in case; I am starting to think it's not even tracking anymore, but rather the image stabilization of the R7. This begs the question, why does it work against itself? The lens I use is an 18-150mm STM from Canon, so it should be fully compatible, and in normal situations it also