FP L

It's just because of the default rendering of DxO, its contrast curve just happens to pull most of the image down. Here is what the default rendering from Capture One looks like : It's still a bit dark but it was definitely the intent. I took this shot with a Sigma fp, and most experienced owners o

A lot of people would say that with the exact same subject, lighting, and lens, it’s getting really hard to tell the difference between the FX3 (or really any consumer mirrorless camera) and an Alexa, a Venice, a high end RED model, etc. In a lot of ways this is true, but if you ask me, there is sti

I've been really struggling with the decision of what newer camera to buy. I had a bad experience with Sony and Nikon Z, because I am so spoiled by the colors and contrast of my CCD DSLR collection — especially the Pentax 645D — and my Sigma fp. Ergonomics are important (hate menus), and I need real

Thank you for detalied review! I got the TTArt 40f2 just 10 days ago and loving it so far on my Sigma FP L and Lumix S9, I was thinking to get the SGimg too especially for the FP L and this review helped me to decide, thank you again!

Thank you for the info! The Photons to Photos is great! Looks like the only real option for more DR than the fp or fp L is… the Fuji GFX 100s I or II lmao. At least they have IBIS? 😭 And thank you for the compliment. I wish I hadn't whiffed it. The blur is ultimately from low shutter speed — it's de

ngl i'd lean Sigma FP here. the OG BMPCC is beloved but that old sensor and battery situation will frustrate you as a beginner. FP gives you full frame, great color science, and a modular path to grow into. the SSD recording is a lifesaver too. pick up a used FP body and a cheap 50mm lens to learn o

I think you’re missing the point though; grey means it is clipping so there is no data. If there was data then you’d be able to edit the color down to what you wanted. This isn’t B&W, your color perception/depth/feel changes drastically by how bright/dark it is, not just saturation. Film is a lot mo

It all started with the Ricoh griiix which made me enjoy photography and the fov constraint really helped. Then I went for the sigma fpl - really undervalued camera IMO. Started collecting vintage lenses as well as quirkier cameras (dxo one, light l16, pentax q10, samsung nx mini, sigma sd quatteo,

The equivalence is not straight forward, if price doesn’t matter canon can give you better performance You will definitely need to accept different menu philosophy and af underperformance but im assuming you went over it The S1Rii might exactly hit the spot and then you may get all you need, but equ

I bought a Sigma FP once because it works as a good viewfinder but it never found its way into my workflow and I just stayed using Artemis. I STILL want a viewfinder because I think it'll focus me a little more and I just hate using my phone but I haven't stumbled on anything sooo....lmk if you find