Alpha 7 V

Bei „schnellen“ Motiven würde ich weder Hasselblad noch Leica wählen. Wenn du Kohle hast und die unbedingt dringend ausgeben willst (warum auch immer), geh in nen Laden, hol dir ne Sony A7RV, A7V oder ne Canon R5 m/R5MII oder R6MII/R6MIII und die entsprechenden G/GM (Sony) oder L (Canon) Objektive.

I'm definitely not as knowledgeable as many others in this sub for video, but to answer some of your questions: Shutter angle: Yes, Lumix offers this setting, I believe since the S1H at minimum. IBIS: it's not even close in video. In photography, I'd say there is at most a small gap, but video is no

Die Hasselblad ist komplett ungeeignet wenn man kaum Erfahrung hat, auch für viele Leute die Professionell arbeiten ist diese Kamera nichts da sie riesen Daten erzeugt und auch extrem teuer im Unterhalt ist was Objektive angeht.Die Leica ist halt ne Leica, kostet viel und hat einen gewissen Prestige

Well it is two different systems. If you are already in Nikon, no a7v ist not fucking hard enough to switch systems. If you are already in Sony, no Z6 III ist not fucking hard enough to switch systems. If you don't own anything yet, both are too much for a beginner. That's just my take on things.

You’re comparing entry level full frame Nikon with pro-sumer level Sony. If money isn’t an issue, I would be looking at the Z6iii. It’s a better comparison to an A7IV, and possible A7V, whenever that may be released. You could buy the Tamron 35-150 and the Nikon primes now and still use them on your

I went from Nikon DSLR to Sony A7 series, and honestly, I have mixed feelings. I miss a lot of stuff from the Nikon ecosystem, I REALLY miss that top LCD screen, I get a lot of people don’t like it but Nikon and Canon can’t both be wrong. I still feel less comfortable with the Sony body layout than

It’s tough to answer, because price is such a huge factor - the difference between them is pretty significant (~700 USD more expensive for the a7CII even on sale). I had the A7CII and the A7CR at various points over the last few years - technically they’re better cameras than the S9, better AF, bett

There were a few reasons why I didn’t get along with the X100VI, and why I returned it to keep the RX1R III, even though I have an X-H2S (soon to be replaced by an as yet unknown Sony). The first was the autofocus performance. My X-H2S is acceptable, if not Sony good, but the X100VI is only ok in AF

Both are great cameras. For sports, you'd have to consider if 40 FPS is more important than 14-bit + blackout free shooting. It also seems that the buffer on the R6iii is better. In a comment of his YouTube video, Gordon Laing replied saying that the delay on the R6iii's EVF is not significant in or

😂. I need a solution for photos and videos. Small, light. Sony, because I have Sony lenses. I’m an A7IV user. Sometimes I need to follow a subject side to side, for example. Image will warp. I need a faster sensor readout. Options are A7V, FX3, A9III. A9III is expensive. FX3 is old. A7V feels just r