Alpha 7R IV

OM isn't 'the poorest system' for landscapes. That's a narrow mindset of the uninformed (usually FF shooters who've never used M43 and go by specs). It's extremely difficult to tell the difference between 11 or 12 stops in a print (for example). The difference is more in the operator than the gear.

Depends what the problem is that you’re seeing, they look pretty good to me from here but that’s with reddit compression. If you’re pixel peeping then yeah, most scans aren’t going to be sharp enough; I’ve had the same roll scanned with 4 different scanners/cameras and the sharpest result I had was

Professional underwater photographer of 12+ years here. Bringing that Sony A7R4 underwater is not going to be cheap no matter what you do. You could try finding a used underwater housing for it, but even then - like buying a used car - I myself would never buy used until it gets serviced to replace

Well, AFAIK they have a decent resale value so if you're not using it you might as well move on from it. There's two main reasons I fell in love with the smallest M4/3 body options and why I still have two of them tho (GM1 & GX850 but I prefer the latter): A) they're good bodies to take to concerts

cheap 75 mpx camera XDthe cheapest high res you could buy is probably a used sony a7R IV, which is a full frame 61mpx. with a good sharp lens, you can get very detailed photos with it. or maybe a used canon 5DS. But you also need sharp high quality glass to have the resolving power for high res sens

It depends on whether you want to move towards video at some point. For example, I use both the Sony A7IV and the Sony A7R IV. The R is usually overkill, but great if you only want to take photos from the front of house or if you want to print extremely large images. The A7 IV performs as well in ph

Because, from what I gather, the Sony is supposed to be more resolving. When comparing the original and II versions of the Nikkor 24-70 2.8 (according to reviews), the II version is overall sharper than the original, while the original is supposedly not far behind the II - and in the center the orig

I know this post is older but it just came up in my feed. Anyways, a little background; I didn't have an SL, but I did have a Leica M11, awesome camera, would still have it but I missed something about my Sony A7RIV that I had prior. So after 2 years with the Leica, I sold it and picked up my A7CR,

I know this is a Leica sub but I believe it is fundamentally wrong to dismiss the Sony A7Riv and v which use the same sensor as in the Leica M11 series, SL3 and Q3. None of those Leica series cameras produces good JPEGs straight out of the camera (SOOC). You have to edit RAW images to obtain optimal

Meine Meinung ist, dass man sich beim Kauf einer Kamera als erstes nach der Objektivauswahl bzw dem Ökösystem umsehen sollte und sich erst dann die passende Kamera dazu sucht. Da du ja quasi noch Anfänger bist, wäre es schon sinnvoll bei einem der moderneren und benutzerfreundlichen spiegellosen Sys