EOS R7

You're absolutely right - but as someone who shot wildlife on an old DSLR and a tiny EF-S telephoto lens for 3 years - good glass and modern AF are things I wish I'd invested in years ago. I initially refused to spend too much on equipment for a hobby I was likely to give up on soon (thanks ADHD!),

Hi. Long time wildlife photographer here. You can see my work from my instagram where you can find photos and videos similar to what you are looking for. Metin Kastro (@metinkastro_wildlife) • Instagram photos and videos Now coming to your question... I would recommend you the R7 from Canon, roughly

RX 10 IV...I owned one of these... a helluva camera. You may be aware that they have been discontinued. No one else has made a 'dad camera' as good as this one. so, these are worth a lot. i bought mine new in 2018 or so ... might have been around $1600. I think I got $800 when I sold it. They are se

I have a Canon EOS R7 18-150mm lens kit.

I for the life of me can’t figure out the auto focus. I switched my focus from the shoot button to an AF button on the front, which is super easy to use. It also has helped tremendously, but I still have focus issues.

On another note, I’m having trouble

Hi, longtime wildlife photographer here. I have the R8 which I use for wildlife video work. It has great low light capability and top of the line autofocus.. I do not know the Nikon line up but as a starter kit, Canon R8 with the RF100-400mm lens will be a good one. If you have the means, the R7 wou

Pictures taken with canon eos r7 and 7 artisans 7.5. They are a bit out of focus because the lense is manual and the cat didn’t stop moving

A Canon R7 paired with a Sigma 150-600mm contemporary lens. It's a good combo for wildlife.

Well, objectively there is not best brand. They are all used by professionals. They all have prow and cons. Canon is nice for wildlife as they have a lot of telephoto lens options, and the r7 is a brilliant wildlife camera (aosc, 33mp, 15fps). I went Sony because of the lens choices, they have way m

Welcome to the world of macro photography. No you will not get more depth of field straight out of the camera matter in fact you are working against yourself using apertures like f/11 and higher. Using the Tamron SP 90mm macro you are going to do much better using f/5.6, Why you ask. Easy it is call

The camera struggle is very real! As a former Fuji system owner (have had access to or owned the XT30ii and XT5), the XT-1 and 50-200mm (not sure which one you have, I see a 55-230 and 55-200 in their current lineup) falls short for wildlife (slow autofocus and not bright lens) and isn't really a gr