LUMIX S9

I personally wouldn’t want fixed lens. The S9 has huge potential and I’m sure Panasonic will make it even better with the S9ii. I’d rather they take inspiration from the GX series. It needs a grip!

Matt from Lumix recently stated the camera has far exceeded their expectations in terms of sales. It’s a really popular item for them. I got one myself recently, mainly to use as a EDC for video and to be able to take the occasional higher quality picture. Background: I started my Lumix journey with

I'm sorry but I feel like Panasonic is helpless. They swing and miss with everything since the GX85. I love what they are trying to do but this leaves so many questions. I also love Emily's videos, but she is a content creator, she raves about a camera like the OM-3, then a couple weeks after her "1

From all my years of using cameras, S9 would be a wise choice. Why? Cameras need to be as compact as possible so you can always have it in your bag and shoot whenever you wanna capture something. Pair it with either a prime M lense (35mm or 50mm) (if you prefer pristine image quality) or an Lumix 18

I switched from a Fuji xh2 to lumix s9 and am very happy with it! Saving up for the s1rii

I have both. S9 is definitely superior, but the size, ease of carry and the fun of using the X100VI is what sold it to me. Hopefully we continue to see more smaller lenses come out for the Lumix!

I'm not a huge fan of the S9 body. It's more of a fashion accessory, and it's not even that small, all things considered (no EVF, no MSHTR - at least it's got IBIS). I would like to see the sensor in a G100 body - with IBIS. Probably not realistic though - both physically and considering how Panason

The segment of consumers who want to spend big on a small FF body is probably pretty small and there is already the A7C and a bunch of very nice APS-C cameras. Panasonic has a very small market share in comparison to Sony. By creating a cheap (and very light) camera, they are targeting an entirely n

I have both. S9 is slightly bigger but depending on the lenses you want, the L mount lenses can be smaller actually. 18-40mm is unrivaled anywhere on any mount for a UWA zoom (the sony 10-20mm is closest but still bigger). The 28-200mm is smaller than fuji's 18-135mm. The sigma 24mm f/2 is smaller t

I almost sold it due to the lack of Viltrox Air lenses in particular, I ordered a big grip for it, got meike 85 1.8 pro. I liked the camera body so much, I don't want to sell it. It has amazing screen contrary to Sony cameras, very nice menu system, touchscreen. Really, sigma with 600$ lenses is the