a6700

I think most of this is purely the aesthetics of the camera. Fuji cameras & the retro looks are just sexier right now, esp the 100vi. There is nothing sexy about the a6700 or the a7v. The a7c series with the steel accent is the closest. I feel that if you can improve the aesthetics of the camera and

Out of these 2 I'd go for A6700. It's more compact, and it's got ergonomics that was not outdated 50 years ago. If it was me choosing I'd go for OM-5 with 12-45 if size really mattered or OM-1 with 12-40 if I could "afford" a little bigger and heavier setup.

RX100vii is still the most capable as of Spring 26. Best? Not easily answered. Ergonomically, it is a difficult camera to use - the APS-C (Sony, Fuji) are much better ergonomically and photo quality is similar. Price on the RX100, even used is ridiculous. No weather sealing. The viewfinder is barely

One thing that can bring you closer to the Fuji experience: use a lens with an aperture ring. That frees up the front and rear dials to be dedicated to shutter speed and ISO, which feels much more natural. That said, I made the jump from the XT3 to XT4 to XT5 and ultimately landed on the a6700, and

I'll start this off by clarifying I only have experience with Sony & Olympus / OM systems. I've tried to use the Sony A6700 and the Sony 90mm for handheld insect macro photography and eventually gave up. The sensor readout time and buffer were too slow for my style of photography. I ended up going w

Don't let glasses or EVF placement dissuade you from using the EVF. With either camera just get an add-on rubber eye cup and adjust the diopter for viewing through your glasses. The worst you'll deal with is a little nose tip smudge on your back display. EVFs exist for a reason. As for which camera,

I was debating between the Sony a6700 and Fuji X-e5 for months, that's why I followed this sub. I noticed a difference in photos being shared on reddit and facebook groups by people using those cameras. I don't know why but the photos shared by Fuji users are more interesting and more relatable. I t

Yes works fantastically well with any of the a6 series. Assuming you’re using this for wildlife, the biggest benefit you’d get by upgrading camera bodies is super sticky animal or bird eye af. Don’t listen to everyone that says upgrade body first. Glass is far more important than body with modern ca

I haven't used an A6XX-series camera, but one thing you might want to think about is whether it will be easy to handle a long, heavy lens. I say that because you want to do wildlife/sports, which will demand a big lens. The a6700 viewfinder is offset from the centre of the body, unlike the A7 or Can

I've gotten very good results (for the price) with an old Sony A6000 and an adapted Nikkor 500 f/8. The camera and lens set me back 400 total. It's what I carry when I know I'll be leaving my camera sitting in a car, Airbnb, etc. The only MAJOR downside is the lens is manual focus. The body's focus