Alpha 7C II

Ok, this will be an unpopular comment here. Over the years I had an obscene number of m43 bodies and lenses. Currently I own an OM-3. As it stands, my only use case for it, is sports, paired with the wonderful 40-150mm F2.8.I also have a Sony A7CII, and while that camera doesn't have the pretentious

Thanks mate, Yes I’m not sure if it’s the bigger pixels of the a7cii or Sony in general but these files behave nicely when pushed in post.

Personally, for your use-case, I suggest getting the Sony 40mm f2.5G or the Viltrox 35mm f1.8 EVO. I had preordered the L10 but ultimately canceled because I don't want a zoom lens that extends and retracts focal lengths with a motor. I have both FF and m43 gear and similarly shoot a toddler indoors

I think we would go xavc hs 4k - h.265 to just to be conscious on file size but keep it high enough quality. Shooting on 2x Sony a7v and a a7cii (same/ closest sensor) but little body for vlog style shots and gimbal work. So easiest to grade together after.

Sure if you only shoot BW I guess a monochrome sensor would be better but carrying two cameras just to get one (1!) stop better performance is in my opinion crazy. But I’m coming from shooting a Pentax 67 with Tri-x ( 400 iso) 25 years ago :-) Then I would rather bring my Leica Q1 or a Sony A7C II w

For Sony: APSC: FX30, A6700 and ZVE-10 II all share the same sensor and specs, differences are with ergonomics and oveheating risk as you go down. 18-105 is an awesome kit lens as it has oss, internal zoom and decent IQ, but there are plenty of faster, newer and better third party lenses available f

marketing, always has been. there's a reason why sony's a1 ii is 50mp, nikon's z9 is 45mp, and canon's r1 is 24mp. and there's a reason my a7c ii only has 33mp but still effortlessly beats every single 200mp smartphone

Sony a7C II vs. Fuji X-E5 which system for travel/event & portrait/everyday? Hey folks, I'm on the edge of buying into a new system. I recently sold my trusty Canon R6 Mk1 which served me well for the last six years. Lately it just sat in the drawer, because of its size and bulkiness. Just wasn't pr

Try a Sony A7C2 sometime. It doesn’t have the retro aesthetics, but it’s compact, full frame, has better autofocus than canon and there are some amazing, cheap lenses available. Do you even use manual settings besides aperture and exp comp? The dials look nice, but there’s rarely any need to use man

There is no one best. If size matters most you already experienced the IIIx's size. Ricoh build quality isn't as good as Fuji. Both are higher priced for what they are. If you don't mind carrying at least a small bag then go Fuji, if you need pocket carry your only choice is GR. I've owned the IIIx