EOS R6 Mark III RF24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM Lens Kit

Genuinely confused as to how you could get this so wrong. The S1II and the A7V are the same price currently in the US ($2899), The R6 III is $100 cheaper, Nikon Z8 starts at $3100 used on MPB, and the A1 starts at $3400 used. At $2356, the S1ii a DEAL. Let's break this down: - Photography: all the b

You can get a refurb Z8 for new A7V money if you hunt the sales. Z6iii is much cheaper and still extremely good, if you don't need the pixels, the Z6iii is simply a better choice than the A7iv (in fact I'd argue the Z5ii is generally a better choice than the A7iv, having owned both) Despite the use

I have good news on the first point, my friend: Canon isn't claiming any particular technological leaps with this sensor, but our initial testing shows that it has even faster readout speeds than the lower-resolution chip found in the EOS R6 II. The R6 III has some truly impressive rolling shutter r

I have the em1ii with the 12-40f2.8 and the 40-150f2.8. I enjoy the system overall but recently decided to run a dual setup with canon r6iii paired with the 24-105 and 100-500. Honestly, I’m actually enjoying the canon a lot more. It isn’t as heavy as I’d feared and the IQ is incredible. I originall

Canon is good but R6III has serious overheating problems (even in burst photo mode). For video only Lumix is good (nice ibis, codecs, open gate). If you want video oriented only go Lumix

Imo the FX3 doesn’t generally would make sense in a vacuum but there is competition and Sony has allegedly registered the FX3ii which means it will probably be released soon. I think the biggest pros for the FX3 are lowlight, great autofocus, easy to edit files, full sensor 4k and also compatibility

Great. That would speak for the R6V/R6iii imo. Depending on if you want to shoot stills as well you might want to look at the R6iii as well(viewfinder). If you need extreme lowlight capabilities for instance i‘d get the FX3. Also keep in mind that the FX3 has a 1:1 readout in 4k and the Canon is lin

I stay away from canon because of the locked down RF lens ecosystem. Sony gets all of the third party lenses and accessories first because they have the largest market share that allows third party lenses. Also canon typically doesn’t have great dynamic range. The R6iii tests done by CineD were lowe

Re. colour science: The "colour science" differences between various manufacturers is basically a non-issue at this point. It's pretty darn simple for someone with even an intermediate understanding of color correction to match one camera to the next so long as you're recording in log in at least 10

You have pretty great camera for docs really, and w24-70 is great too The main problem with canon is that it’s expensive not underperforming. Now if you wanted 2 more R6ii or r6iii and 3x24-70… it gets pricy. R5m1 is overheating but the rest is rather fine. I doubt 70-200 will be that useful but wit