Cinema Line FX30

An S1ii costs less than an FX3 and outperforms it. If I didn't have Sony glass I'd take that over an FX3 or FX30 any day (I'm still shooting Sony with over 1k paid gigs done on an a7siii/FX3 so not a Panasonic shill, just being objective)

Saying an fx3 let alone an fx30 delivers a better image than a ursa g2 is so far from reality. The Ursa has one of the best latitudes for a S35 sensor, build in ND's, RAW flexibility and overall a better user interface. The image quality outperforms both the fx3 and fx30 in lab tests. Media options

Same issue on FX3, FX30, Burano... Sony doesn't want you to use anamorphic unless you're using a Venice and paying them a license for anamorphic firmware. There are other quirks you might encounter shooting anamorphics on Sony bodies, but don't expect them to fix them

Sony not creating an FX-3II is a big mistake. Nikons ZR will have the ZR pro version, will blow FX-30 away. LUMIX has some super video cams,then kineinfinity now, really interesting. Canon just came out with something… Sony is great, I’m a Sony shooter. Though for video maybe something else.

The price is laughable considering this is a glorified A7IV that's priced significantly more. Still no open gate, only 4K60 at S35 crop in 2025? Especially considering Lumix just dropped the S1ii e which is more comparable in price to an A7IV but gives you internal ProRes Raw, 32bit float audio, 6K

I'm actually using the OG BMPCC and Micro Cinema cameras (I have two of those), so my speedbooster wouldn't work on your camera. I also have a Sony FX30, which is Super 35/APS-C, and I actually use a Metabones speedbooster on that as well, mainly because I have full-frame lenses apart from the Sigma

But why would a Sony FX2 or FX30 would need like 61MP as the a7cr, when it‘s insisted purpose is video? 4k60fps should be the standard, maybe 120fps or even 8k for future use since it‘s still not THE standard in consumer market TV‘s, unlike 4K. Anything bigger just consumes too much power to scale/r