EOS R6 Mark II

I use Canon Mirrorless at work (R6ii) and shoot Nikon for myself for 10+ years. The canon is nice, for sure, better AF than the Mk 1 and 2 z6's, it can do 4k60 with almost no crop, very capable hybrid. Colors are pretty good, a bit cold overall. Lenses are nice, but the ecosystem is pretty locked of

I’m a professional theatre and Ballet shooter, my wide camera (24-70) has to stay at f/5.6 and as slow of a SS as needed to stop most of the motion so a minimum of 160. My iso lives on auto. My darkest plays can hit iso 25,600. On my 70-200 camera I’m allowed to shoot all the way down to f/2.8 and s

A Canon R6MkII for professional work, Leica for fun and personal projects.

I just upgraded one of my R6 to a R6iii. It definitely is nice, but you'd have to buy some CFexpress cards and the new camera hates batteries that aren't the newest model of LP6. It gives warnings every time you turn on the camera with other real Canon batteries and won't turn on with 3rd party ones

If you already had Canon RF glass it would be one thing, but, I would not be willing to replace a Sony 24-70 GM ii for an older EF lens with an adapter. I know someone with an R6ii paired with an EF 24-70 and that thing just sucks to use. Like you can feel the lens motors twitching back and forth wh

You have pretty great camera for docs really, and w24-70 is great too The main problem with canon is that it’s expensive not underperforming. Now if you wanted 2 more R6ii or r6iii and 3x24-70… it gets pricy. R5m1 is overheating but the rest is rather fine. I doubt 70-200 will be that useful but wit

A lot of people saying they would only do it if it was interest-free. If that’s an option, then there really isn’t a downside. Though, when I was in this scenario, I didn’t have those options available to me and I still pulled the trigger. It was the best decision I could have made. I was shooting o

Good question. My two mentors are Canon shooters, as are some of my photography heroes, so starting with Canon made sense. That said, I did take a long look at Nikon and Sony when I was ready to step up to pro gear. I didn't like the ergonomics of Sony. Not that they don't make great gear, they just

I have a canon r50v and use it for a wide shot during church weddings. It has overheated a few times for me (one warmer days). Video looks softer compared to my canon r6ii but still very much useable.

I chose the R6ii simply because I transitioned from Canon EF DSLR and wanted to use my collection of EF glass adapted on a mirrorless body. Some of the EF lenses did not have lens IS and I wanted IBIS. On top of that I had several LP-E6NH batteries from my 5D4 and 6D2 that would directly cross over